3 things I learned:
- wikipedia has tutorials for prospective editors on structure, format, and style
- there is a discussion forum for each article that encourages debates about editorial choices
- footnotes provide commentary along with the citations
- i never thought about the idea of looking through encyclopedias for gaps where new research might be possible.
- articles are ranked based upon certain criteria. less than 2,000 articles have achieved the highest honor of "featured articles"
- why do teachers automatically write off anything new instead of trying to discover ways of using new material and technology to encourage critical thinking and judgement.
The idea of debating subjects is genius and promotes critical thinking.
ReplyDelete